API trust. Payment integrity. Evidence.Atlant Security
Fintech/PentestBY ATLANT SECURITY

FINTECH PENETRATION TESTING

Payment logic & transaction-state testing

Examine the decisions between an accepted request and a completed payment.

Discuss your requirements

The boundary worth testing

Replay, duplicate requests, stale approvals and incorrect role separation can affect transaction integrity even when the API is free of common injection defects.

A merchant API may correctly authenticate a caller but fail to bind an object to that merchant. A webhook can be authentic yet replayed at the wrong transaction state. Tests need the product’s expected business decisions, not just a list of endpoint URLs.

What the scope can include

  • Beneficiary changes and approval invalidation
  • Idempotency keys and duplicate-request handling
  • Webhook origin, replay windows and event ordering
  • Limits, refunds and privileged operational workflows

The final proposal identifies the specific applications, accounts, environments and interfaces included. It also states which prerequisites your team or a supplier must provide.

What useful proof looks like

Write expected state transitions before execution. Use seeded transactions and compare application, ledger-simulator and audit states where authorised. Record the observed outcome without implying real money moved.

Preserve UTC time, asset identifier, requesting principal, expected decision and observed response. State-changing tests need confirmation from the resulting object or a trusted audit record. Denied operations and effective controls remain part of the outcome.

Safety and assessment limits

Testing race conditions or volume-sensitive logic requires separate rate and concurrency limits. Live settlement is excluded unless specifically authorised under a controlled plan.

Use dedicated tenants, synthetic customer data and test payment rails with real settlement disabled. Agree partner-system permissions, transaction limits, rollback and release windows. Production activity must have explicit owners and a clear stop channel.

Close the loop

Connect each weakness to a named owner, immediate safeguard and durable correction. Define positive and negative retest cases so the change restores the intended boundary while preserving legitimate use. Open items retain their dependencies and deadlines.

Preview the sector sample report to see the evidence and treatment-plan format.

LET’S START A CONVERSATION

Define the scope.
Take the next step.

Your systems, operating constraints and security objectives. A clear starting point for the test.

Discuss your pentest